Following a discussion about Rome Metro, I found a comapraison between Rome B line and Washington Metro. According to different surveys, Rome Metro is considered one of the most unwelcoming ones: in order to change its perception, lots of long and expensive plans are currently going to improve comfort (see here and here). Anyway, some cheaper and easier interventions could improve passengers’ comfort with less time and less money.
Let’s look for example at Paris RER E.
The current terminus, Haussmann-Saint Lazare:
The following station, Magenta:
And now, let’s look at Rome metro, Line B, Station “Termini”:
Paris RER and rome Metro’s architecture are basically the same: a big vaulted space, including both directions’s track and platform, and smaller vaulted spaces, hosting escalators. Anyway, small differences change dramatically the place’s perception:
- Paris RER uses strong and warm lights, which are able to give a feeling of “home”, while Rome Metro uses standard neons, which give a general sense of coldness
- Paris RER integrates station names into the station’s architecture, while Rome Metro uses standard signs in every stations
- Paris RER integrates different materials in a global design, while in Rome Metro each intervention follows its own concept without integrating with the rest of the environment.
An intervention on Rome Metro could include:
- A new lighting concept, which would emphatize the architectural structure of the station,
- New floor and wall tiles,
- A new lettering and signage concept.
(source of all images: wikipedia)